Notice, there is no blood oath, no dagger, no theatrics.
Also from http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuit
False, the "oath" recorded in the congressional record is the equally false Knights of Columbus "oath". Paisley does not mention that it is also called "false and libelous" on page 3221. (see here)
|[The following is the text of the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction as recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216),|
FALSE, it can be read in any copy of the congressional record, there is not just one, and people have looked it up (see here) This is Lie #2
|from which it was subsequently torn out.|
I hunted and could find no record of this book or author, only the crediting of this quote in many places. Given that his first two statements are lies, it is highly unlikely this is true either.
|The Oath is also quoted by Charles Didier in his book Subterranean Rome (New York, 1843), translated from the French original.|
Lie #4, Alberto was never a Jesuit, nor a Priest. Despite years of requests, he was never able to offer even one shred of proof for his claims.
|Dr. Alberto Rivera, who escaped from the Jesuit Order in 1967, confirms that the induction ceremony and the text of the Jesuit Oath which he took were identical to what we have cited below. – A. N.]|
The Oath is the work of English forger Robert Ware, it was first printed in his book ""Foxes and Firebrands" in 1682. NO Catholic has ever taken such and oath, and no Catholic ever would.
Now, can we put this to rest once and for all?